Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Kecamatan Sukmajaya Kota Depok

Mohammad Rofik; Ade Sri Mulyani

doi:10.59603/ppiman.v2i4.545

Authors

Mohammad Rofik Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Ade Sri Mulyani Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59603/ppiman.v2i4.545

Keywords:

Discipline, Motivation, Performance

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify some significant effects of work discipline and motivation on the work performance of the deputy governor of the Sukmajaya district of the Depok city. The quantitative deskriptif method is the one used in this study. In this survey, 36 respondents who were dikantors of Sukmajaya Kota Depok were polled. Uji Validitas, Uju Realiabilitas, Uji Asumsi Klasik, Uji Normalitas, Uji Heteroskedastisitas, Uji Multikolinearitas, Uji Regresi Liner Berganda, Uji T (Parsial), Uji F (Stimultan), dan Uji Koefisien Determinasi sebagaian langit. Discipline-related discipline effects on work performance have a Thitung>TTabel ( 8,485 > 2,035 ) value; this is supported by a signifikativity of 0.000<0,05. This can be interpreted as meaning that Ho is dead and Ha is alive. The influence of motivation on employee work performance has a Thitung>TTabel (30,626 > 2,035) value; this may be explained by a signifikan 0,000<0,005. This can be seen as showing that Ho is tolak and Ha is diterima. The impact of work discipline and motivation simultaneously on the work-related kinerja is demonstrated by the Fhitung > 1141,097 > 4,13 and the signifikan 0,000 < 0,005 nilai koefisien determinasi (R2), which is around 0.986. This indicates that job satisfaction and work culture have a positive effect on employee work performance of around 0.986% or 98.6%, while the influence of other factors is responsible for the remaining 1.4% or 0.14 percent. It may be inferred from this that Ho is not the same as Ha.

References

Armand, F. (2003). Social marketing models for product-based reproductive health programs: A comparative analysis. Occasional Paper Series. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.cmsproject.com.

Belair, A. R. (2003). Shopping for your self: When marketing becomes a social problem (Dissertation). Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Berliana, Nova. (2021). Landasan teori اديدج. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, 2(1985), 17–39.

Billy Nugraha. (2022). Pengembangan uji statistik. Jakarta.

Chain, P. (1997). Same or different?: A comparison of the beliefs Australian and Chinese university students hold about learning's. Proceedings of AARE Conference. Swinburne University. Available at: http://www.swin.edu.au/aare/97pap/CHAN97058.html, diakses tanggal 27 Mei 2000.

Kotler, P., & Lee, N. R. (2009). Up and out of poverty: The social marketing solution. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Lindawati. (2015). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku ekonomi dan kesejahteraan rumah tangga petani usahatani terpadu padi-sapi di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Retrieved from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/85350.

LPPSP. (2016). Statistik Indonesia 2016. Badan Pusat Statistik, 676. Jakarta. Diakses dari https://www.lppsp.go.id/index.php/publikasi/326.

Mardiatmoko, Gun-. (2020). Pentingnya uji asumsi klasik pada analisis regresi linier berganda. BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika Dan Terapan, 14(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol14iss3pp333-342.

Mary Parker. (2018). Dasar-dasar manajemen. Jakarta Timur.

Norsyaheera, A. W., Lailatul, F. A. H., Shahid, S. A. M., & Maon, S. N. (2016). The relationship between marketing mix and customer loyalty in hijab industry: The mediating effect of customer satisfaction. In Procedia Economics and Finance (Vol. 37, pp. 366–371). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30138-1.

Nurmadiah, N. (2020). Manajemen sarana dan prasarana. Al-Afkar: Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.32520/afkar.v6i1.190.

Pratiwi, D., Fauzi, A., Febrianti, B., Noviyanti, D., Permatasari, E., & Rahmah, N. (2023). Pengaruh pelatihan, komunikasi dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan (Literature review manajemen kinerja). JEMSI: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 4(3), 561–571.

Puspita, D., & Widodo, S. (2020). Pengaruh disiplin kerja dan motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawan PT. Persada Arkana Buana. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Manajemen Unsurya, 1(1), 31–41.

Rahayu, S., & Dahlia, D. (2023). Pengaruh disiplin kerja, motivasi kerja dan komitmen organisasi terhadap kepuasan kerja dan kinerja pegawai. Jesya, 6(1), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v6i1.925.

Risdwiyanto, A. (2016). Tas kresek berbayar, ubah perilaku belanja? Kedaulatan Rakyat, 22 Februari, 12.

Siemin Ciamas, Elserra, & Siahaan, R. B. F. (2021). Seminar nasional sains dan teknologi informasi (SENSASI). Agustus, 491–495.

StatSoft, Inc. (1997). Electronic statistic textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft Online. Available at: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html, diakses tanggal 27 Mei 2000.

Sugiyono, Prof. Dr. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif (Vol. 6).